In Case Dead Don’t Turn Out for 2016; The Plan to Import Third World Democrats

Last week the Obongo administration announced an “initiative” to encourage the United States’ estimated 8.8 million LPRs (“lawful permanent residents” or green card holders) to naturalize and become U.S. citizens. To anyone with even half of their brain cells firing on at least one cylinder this is a very obvious and transparent attempt to shore up the Democrats’ election chances in 2016, as again, everyone knows that immigrants overwhelmingly vote for liberal swine for a variety of different reasons, such as free shit, guilt, the desire for yet more free shit, etc.

Self-explanatory.

Bill Clinton did it before Obongo, and I’m sure it will be a Democratic tradition for many years to come unless we finally decide to outlaw the DNC and send its leaders to internment camps for their continued sedition against this country (here’s hoping).

Regardless, the fact that they’re announcing it now is still a good indicator that they might be getting nervous that their usual election day die-hards (such as the dead, illegals, drug addicts, homosexuals, welfare mooches, minorities, etc.) might not be enough to quash what they see as a burgeoning quasi-nationalist right-wing American movement (rallying behind none other than the hero himself Donald Trump).

Illegals vote twice; inner city blacks vote thrice.

Could the “Coalition of the Disaffected” be in trouble for 2016? For the sake of this country I sure as hell hope so. Regardless, the liberals’ attempt go effectively conquer this nation by importing dimwitted third worlders to do their bidding should make anyone with even an ounce of self-respect throw up in their mouths. The fact that liberals have willingly imported hordes of third world scum just so they can maintain their tenuous grasp on power in this country will assuredly secure each and every one of them an especially agonizing stay in Hell; however, until then, the rest of us will unfortunately have to deal with them on this plane of existence.

And deal with them we will…

Anyways, this “citizenship initiative” will mean long lines down at your local USCIS office and overworked, uncaring, and oftentimes just plain retarded Immigration Officers rubber stamping dozens of naturalization applications per day. I personally have seen these citizenship interviews– most of them are conducted by officers who really don’t give a flying fuck (and, even more ridiculous, a lot of times these officers are freaking foreigners themselves! you can tell from their accents and/or appearances) and, as long as you don’t come out at the interview and say something like “everything I just said was a big fat lie, and oh yeah, your mother’s a whore,” the officer is more than likely going to approve your application. Once in a blue moon you’ll see an officer who actually knows the dangers immigrants pose to the United States and will do everything legally in his power to deny as many applications as they can. However, even if a case is denied the immigrant can appeal, and then sometimes appeal that appeal in an appellate process that can drag on for years and years. That’s why the joke among many practitioners in the immigration field is that “it ain’t over until the immigrant wins.” I personally know of one case where the immigrant being interviewed for his citizenship couldn’t even remember the name of the person who had filed a petition for him to obtain his green card. His case was approved and he’s now a citizen (and I’m sure a registered Democrat). Just another hard day’s work for America’s crack team of USCIS officers.

“We win, vato.”

And 8.8 million new Democrats could be just what they need in some of the swing states such as Florida or Ohio to throw the election to the commie Sanders or the dog-face criminal Clinton, depending on which wing of the Democratic party wins out at the convention.

So when you’re out on election day doing your civic duty don’t be surprised if you see even more foreigners than usual speaking terribly broken English (or just speaking in their native language), asking which one is the Democrat and how do they vote for them. But hey, maybe some cucks will be out there too trying to convince some of those “natural conservatives” about the joys of tax cuts for hedge fund hyenas or cheap labor for Fortune 500 companies? Maybe they’ll even try to convince these generational moochers that hard work and responsibility are virtues? More likely though is that the foreign scum will be bused from polling station to polling station (along with their illegal and non-voting family members, because hey, voter ID laws are racist!) by disgusting Democratic operatives as they cast vote after vote after vote in order to to ensure that their meal tickets stay punched for many a-year to come.

Amen, Kent.

Advertisements

“Children of Men”: An Exemplar of How to Deal With the European Refugee Crisis

Children of Men

The 2006 movie, “Children of Men,” is based on a 1992 novel published by British novelist P.D. James similarly entitled “The Children of Men.” I have not yet read the novel (I ordered a copy this week) but I am told that the novel is a quite a bit different than the movie. Nevertheless, the 2006 film starring Clive Owen provides an excellent example of what will happen to Europe in the future if the refugee crisis is not handled properly, and also a model of how to handle the same.

For those who haven’t seen the film I’ll unfortunately have to spoil some of it in order to make my point so, fair warning.

The movie takes place in the year 2027 in a world where women are now infertile for some reason which is never revealed. The world has now devolved into chaos with the one exception being the great nation of Great Britain– the sole remaining country with any semblance of stability and normality left. Therefore, of course, the rest of the world has decided to bum-rush the British isles.

However, for our purposes, why the world has devolved into a chaotic hellhole is actually inconsequential– it could just have easily been a virus, or a stock market crash, or oh, let’s say, massive third world immigration to begin with, which caused society to crumble. For our purposes the fact that society has crumbled is what’s relevant– not what caused it.

Okay, so in the movie the British government has seemingly evolved into some sort of authoritarian state whereby British citizenship is actually held up as a virtue, instead of given out to anyone who can simply set foot on the isles. Refuges, (or “fugees” as they’re called derisively in the film) are hunted down mercilessly and put into refugee camps awaiting ultimate deportation. There is a militant pro-immigrant rights group, called “The Fishes,” who engages in terrorism directed at both the government and civilians. The Fishes claim that they will maintain this constant state of war until the British government recognizes the rights of all immigrants and refugees, or something (you know, standard liberal abstractions that don’t actually have any meaning in reality).

“Blowing shit up in London Town is fun.” – Immigrants.

Then, a bunch of shit happens that’s not really relevant to my point here. However, through these happenings we are introduced to the fact that illegal immigrants in Britain are actually treated like they would be and should be in any sane society that values its sovereignty, its integrity, and its citizens. However, because this is Hollywood after all we are supposed to have lots of feelings for these poor immigrants and think about how the British government are just a big bunch of meanies. Yet, for anyone with any sense, these scenes are inspirational and provide us with a exemplar of how European nations should be treating their refugee populations.

For example, we are shown images of refugees in cages on the streets guarded by heavily armed men; there are also constant PSAs on screens throughout the city warning people about the dangers of illegal immigrants.

This is how you deal with “refugees.”

Again, the movie portrays this as some sort of holocaust or something when in reality it’s exactly how every country in Europe should be dealing with their refugee problem. The unintended subtext of the film (I say “unintended” because there’s almost no way a Hollywood-approved movie would be allowed to be made that harbored an “anti-immigrant” sentiment”) is twofold: (1) without extremely tight and prejudicial immigration controls you cannot have a stable and functioning modern nation-state/society; and (2) in order to keep such stability at least a measure of authoritarian control and power must be wielded, if only when dealing with immigrants.

In the film, British citizens seemingly move about and go about their lives without any meaningful interference from the government. However, as seen above, immigrants are not treated likewise– they are seen as an alien force dangerous to the country’s very existence itself. A nation is not a country in the modern sense unless it can determine who’s allowed to live within its borders and who isn’t– this is the concept of “sovereignty”; something that modern liberals flatly refuse to even attempt to understand. The state gets to decide who gets in, who gets to stay and for how long, and which (if any) rights these non-citizens are privy too. You don’t get the same rights as a British citizen, or an American citizen, or a French citizen just because you happen to step foot on that nation’s soil– it just doesn’t work that way (or at least it shouldn’t).

This is especially relevant in today’s world where mass migration is really not that difficult at all– it can be as simple stepping on a train, a plane, a bus, etc. Back when the European nations (including the United States) were coming into their own the idea of a foreign invasion of “peaceful refugees” was simply not something they could either imagine or comprehend. However, control of the nation’s boundaries was still paramount to the existence of the nation-state, and, irrespective of what some brain-dead liberal will tell you, there has never been any successful society founded on open and unrestricted immigration. This “world without borders” nonsense is also unfortunately a viewpoint that a lot of “libertarians” share, stating that boundaries are “just like, lines on a map, man, or something,” and “you can’t like, own a nation, man.” Okay, sounds good, hippie– go try living in a country with truly unrestricted immigration, like Somalia, and get back to me on that.

Come live in Somalia, an open borders paradise.

A highly functioning and successful society must have strict immigration controls; that is, if it wishes to remain highly functioning and successful. Take Iceland, or Singapore, for example– it is very difficult to immigrate to these nations, let alone enter them just to get on welfare, and they are some of the highest functioning societies on the planet. This is especially true for Singapore, where other necessary aspects of human existence are tightly controlled for the overall betterment of society (e.g., their strict drug laws), but that is a topic for another time. More so, there are other reasons which contribute to these nations’ success, but again, these are topics for another time.

Further, in order to maintain such a society there needs to be some way to track and ensure who is actually a member of said society (i.e., a citizen) and who is an outsider who has no right to be included in the embodiment of the nation-state. In “Children of Men,” it is not expressly addressed but it seems that citizens are required to carry their passports with them at all times as proof of their citizenship. This may seem a bit cumbersome to some people reading this; however, having to carry a little booklet around that confirms your right to membership in a coveted and exclusive association (by this I of course mean your right to citizenship within a Western/European society) seems like a small price to pay when considering the other option– third world domination.

Cheers.

The statement, “papers please,” as in “may I see your identity documents” does not have to be– and should not be– a dirty phrase. It’s only recently that this request has been turned into some sort of dirty phrase or swearword through its association with “fascist police states,” or whatever the slogan stupid liberals are using nowadays to deride orderly societies. If a police officer has a reasonable suspicion that you are an outsider threatening the integrity of the nation he is sworn to defend, he has every right to question you and request that you prove otherwise.

Might seem drastic, but think about the alternative…

The point here is that the refugee crisis in Europe (and the immigration crisis in the United States) cannot be treated lightly; in fact, without any exaggeration, the future of the entire planet depends on it. After all, if Europe and the United States disappear under a morass of third world invaders who’s going to pay to keep them alive?

The future of Europe?

The rest of the plot of “Children of Men” isn’t really relevant to this discussion, so I won’t waste your time describing it to you. If you want to be mildly entertained for about two hours go watch the movie, if only for the excellent portrayal of an orderly and citizenship-conscious society described above.

The European Refugee Crisis; or How I Learned To Accept My Daughter Being Raped By The Third World

Europeans girls and women being raped by third world savages is nothing new on the continent. In fact, unless you’ve been hiding in a cave on Mars with your fingers plugged into your ears, you’ve certainly heard about the “grooming” scandal in Rotherham, England.

Side note: In the United States, “grooming” is what a cat or dog does when it licks itself. Maybe this word has a more serious connotation in the UK, but I think I’ve heard that it’s still pretty tame language, and what the headlines should say are something akin to “Paki Bastards Rape and Torture Young White Britons,” not “Asian Men Groom Girls.”

Regardless, there are stories basically on a daily basis about “refugees” raping European women in their own countries and receiving laughably light sentences for their heinous crimes. For example, there was the Somali scumbag who raped a 12 year old Swedish girl and was sentenced to community service for it. I shit you not– community service for the brutal rape of a minor girl. I don’t know that much about Swedish immigration law but I’d put five against ten that this Somali won’t be deported either, lest his “human rights” be violated.

Where’s Marshal Mannerheim when you need him?

Then, a couple days ago, there was the story of a sort of “flash” or “blitz” rape of a 7 year old girl in Germany. Apparently, it happened so quickly that the girl’s mother didn’t even notice it had happened until the girl came running back to her crying.

Multiculturalism sure is sweet. Unless you’re a white woman, of course.

I’d be here all night if I were to link to even half of the stories about the rape of Europe by the third worlders. The point is, however, that when I hear liberal idiots say things like “what about the poor refugees? They didn’t ask to live in a war zone,” my response always is, “and what about the Europeans that are robbed, raped, and killed by these ‘refugees?’ They certainly didn’t ask for it either!” This is a good example of the liberal mental disease infecting so many whites today– they always take the side of the “outsider,” or the “other” over their own people, even at the expense of the lives of their own family members. I feel bad for anyone related to these morons.

Mental defectives.

I really don’t think it qualifies as “racist” to not want your daughter/sister/mother to be raped by a third world savage. Well, not to a normal person, anyhow. These pro-refugee people are really just communists, following the old Stalinist maxim of “you have to break a couple eggs in order to make an omelet,”; or, in this case, “you have to rape and torture a few thousand white women in order to make Europe multicultural.”

Some liberal douches will retort with, “well, you can’t blame all refugees if one or two of them just happen to rape a European.” Okay– perhaps true enough. I don’t think that every single refugee is a rapist, but the truth is that a lot of them are. More so, if even one European has a crime committed against them by someone who has no right to be in Europe in the first place, then that’s one too many. Again, this goes back to the Stalinist theory of “acceptable collateral damage,” which here means your daughter’s innocence, and perhaps even her life.

According to liberals, this woman is a racist because she’s not into being “surprise sexed” by Islams.

I guess the media or the estrogen in the water has done quite a number on the remaining European male population, because I would think that this issue would be the one that would cause the sort of righteous indignation needed to sweep these Islams out of Europe once and for all. Maybe a few hundred thousand more need to be raped first, just so we can really make sure that refugee rape is a serious problem. We wouldn’t want to act too hastily when refugee feelings are on the line– we all know how delicate they are.

Gentle souls.

Why Donald Trump is a Hero

Hero

Imagine a country of cuckolds, if you will– a bunch of cowardly and supine spineless sycophants too chicken-hearted to even stand up for their own nation and people as it’s overrun with ungrateful third world invaders clamoring for a suck at the withering teat of America.

Now, imagine  a strong white man, unafraid and undeterred by the protectors of political correctness and all things degenerate, subversive, and seditious. Imagine someone who actually speaks a semblance of truth to power, and actually sticks to his guns, even when threatened and boycotted by the professional “outrage” lobby.

Well, if you can imagine that then you can imagine Donald J. Trump standing up for real Americans and continuing to do so when attacked from all sides of the political spectrum. And the best part about all of this is that Trump is undeniably right about just about everything he says. Immigrants do disproportionately commit more crime than natives– same goes with their disproportionate use of welfare. As Ann Coulter has aptly pointed out, every single pro-immigrant “study” that has been trotted out by the mainstream media is complete malarkey. This country is just one giant ATM machine for immigrants– they don’t care about this country, they simply come to suck what they can out of it, for as long as they can. And our insane leaders and insane immigration laws not only allows this, but actively encourage it.

Podemos tener unas cosas gratis, por favor?

I’ve seen it firsthand– the first thing these people want to know when they get here is how to get welfare. And the worst part is, they’ve all heard from their zillions of relatives how easy it is to get here and get on the dole so then they decide to come too; oh, and by the way, Consuela was pregnant when she left Guatemala and she’ll show up at a Texas ER about to pop, but don’t worry, the sucker/American taxpayer will foot the bill.

Which brings me to the complete insanity that is birthright citizenship. This is, of course, yet another reason why Trump is a complete and total hero– by bringing this issue up he really has created a litmus test for us as we move forward in supporting pro-American political candidates. “Are you pro-birthright citizenship? Then you’re a cuck and need to GTFO. You oppose it? Alright, you’re cool.”

Birthright citizenship is utter nonsense for a number of reasons, but I think the easiest example for people to grasp is just to think about this– if my wife and I are traveling through Mongolia and she happens to give birth to my child, while physically within the confines of the nation of Mongolia, does that therefore make my kid Mongolian in some way, shape, or form? How about the fact that the United States and Canada are the only first world countries that follow this retarded policy? Jus soli? More like, jus bullshit.

This is even leaving aside that the 14th Amendment, the spear that the “pro-death of the West lobby” uses to attack “racists” and “xenophobes” who don’t think it’s a good idea to pay uneducated peasants from the third world to birth their children here, was NEVER MEANT TO ALLOW BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP. Senator Jacob Howard, one of the men who worked on one of the committees that actually drafted the amendment, plainly stated that the 14th Amendment could not, and would not be interpreted to mean that the children of foreigners illegally present within the United States would be bestowed with U.S. citizenship just by the geographical happenstance of their birth.

“Anchor babies should be entitled to U.S. citizenship? Go back to Mejico with that crap” – Quote from the Senate Floor

So, when Trump released his immigration plan I very nearly cried tears of joy. Ann Coulter called it the “greatest political document since the Magna Carta,” and to be honest, I don’t think she’s too far off on that one. Ending birthright citizenship will succeed in ending perhaps the biggest draw for illegal immigrants, i.e., “free shit.” It’s through the anchor babies that the majority of illegals get their welfare; some just get it outright because the lazy jerk at the DSS office isn’t checking or verifying ID, but the majority, I’d wager, of welfare going to illegals is passing up through their anchor babies. Therefore, pretty simple, no? No birthright citizenship, no anchor babies; no anchor babies, no free stuff; no free stuff, no reason to immigrate illegally to this country; no reason to immigrate illegally, NO ILLEGALS. Gracias a dios.

Yet, lest I forget the complete clusterfuck that is legal immigration in the United States. That’s right, the problem just isn’t illegal immigration but the immigration of the legal variety as well. Can anyone explain to me why we need to give out even one H-1B visa every year to some foreign techie? Are you seriously telling me that there’s no unemployed Americans (or even green card holders for that matter) who don’t have at least a bachelor’s degree in computer science (or a related field) looking for a job?

“Your replacement arrives from Mumbai next week. Get him up to speed and then get the fuck out. I’ve got a bonus check to cash.”

Then there’s also family-based chain migration, which, in layman’s terms is something akin to, “Well, Paco, Muhammad, and Sun Yat Sen were all able to get their green cards fraudulently somehow, so now they can bring their entire extended family over, and then their extended family gets to bring their own extended family over, and on and on it goes, like a chain.”

Example: Muhammad obtained a green card through political asylum by claiming that he was afraid that the big bad Ruskies were going to persecute him oh so much on account of his adherence to the child-raping pedophile cult that is Islam.

“Islams piss me off.”

Okay, so now Muhammad has a green card. Now, he can petition for his wife and all nine of his children back in Chechnya. And, the 30 different grandchildren he has also get to come as “derivatives.” Oh, and once Muhammad becomes a citizen he can petition for his brothers and sisters too. No one bothers to ask if these people will somehow benefit the United States in any way, but rather, the question is, “are you related to some jerk who has a green card? You are? Good enough, come on in. The seminar on how to get welfare starts in thirty minutes.”

You may think that last bit is satire, but unfortunately, it’s not. Nonprofit organizations and other groups dedicated to using American tax dollars to destroy this country routinely put on “know your rights” seminars for illegals, which translates to “learn how to exploit and take advantage of this country’s generosity in the most effective manner possible.”

Trump brought up in his immigration paper how the “refugee racket” needs to be reformed, and he’s just putting it lightly. Why should we feel obligated to give anyone asylum in this country? I don’t understand how “my country of origin did some mean things to me” translates to “okay, now you get to live in the greatest country in the history of the world and get free stuff forever.” Other countries arrest you if you go there and try to claim political asylum– there’s an example we need to follow.

The bottom line is that Donald Trump is a hero for bringing to the forefront the issue of our time. He was totally right when he shot back at the weasel-faced snob, Chris Wallace, during the first Republican debate that no one would even be talking about immigration if it wasn’t for him. And this, among many other positive attributes, is why The Donald should be declared President for Life of these Great United States of America. God Willing.

The Camp of the Saints

I saw a video today of refugees in Europe refusing aid from what looked like Hungarian policemen. I guess they’re too “proud” to accept something as trivial as a case of bottled water, but it’s not beneath them to bum-rush an entire continent in order to make their way to the countries with the most generous welfare systems, and then immediately get on the dole.

Self-explanatory

This is of course right out of the excellent novel “The Camp of the Saints,” written by Jean Raspail. The novel was written in the 70s sometime, I believe, but it must be read now by all immigration patriots and decent-minded people alike in order to understand what lies ahead for the West if this tide of “refugees” isn’t stopped, pronto.

The premise of the novel is that a gigantic convoy of boats from the Third World is heading to Europe to claim their free goodies and take what’s “rightfully theirs.” Twice in the novel, whites try to airlift aid to the despicable and tragic convoy (called the “Last Chance Armada” in the novel– as in, last chance to destroy the West) on the high seas. And twice, without fail, the inhabitants of the armada swiftly throw all the aid overboard, and even kill a couple whites in the process for good measure. The liberal media in the novel of course immediately makes excuses for the third world horde, claiming that the poor innocents travelers were afraid that the evil white man had poisoned the foodstuffs and water prior to dropping it on the boats. However, the real reason is self-evident– the horde hates us. They resent the West for its prosperity and, for some unknown reason (*cough, cough, the media) they think our wealth belongs to them. They’re not invading Europe for some table scraps, they want the whole shebang, and they’ll accept nothing less.

Modern day “Last Chance Armada.”

You can imagine how the novel ends; and it’s because of this ending that Jean Raspail’s excellent work is more relevant than ever. Any book that sniveling liberals call “racist” and/or “xenophobic” has to be worth your time. If you’re not quite ready to give over our societies to people who engage in female circumcision, honor killings, open-air defecation, and countless other sorts disgusting and revolting barbarism, do yourself a favor and pick up a copy.

Sometimes, sharing isn’t caring.